{
  "format": "rebe.estate-concept-compare.v1",
  "left": {
    "format": "rebe.estate-concept.v1",
    "kind": "concept",
    "term": {
      "id": "commons",
      "label": "Commons",
      "definition": "The shared behavior, interfaces and institutions no single Realm governs, including the Creator's. Not a fourth pillar or an owner of instance data.",
      "tier": "entrenched",
      "status": "proposed",
      "relations": [],
      "examples": [
        "The Court",
        "Shared settings contracts"
      ],
      "nonExamples": [
        "A central service with apply authority into Realms"
      ],
      "decisionRef": null,
      "conceptRef": "thecy-ascode ontology/CONCEPTS.md"
    },
    "nine": {
      "state": "proposed",
      "source": "thecy-ascode ascode/architecture/estate/commons/NINE.json",
      "status": "Proposed component wording grounded in Creator direction; not attributed personal declarations or credential authority",
      "facets": [
        {
          "key": "belief",
          "question": "What does it hold to be true?",
          "statement": "People and machine Things should be able to choose behavior and resources while retaining control of their own data and credentials."
        },
        {
          "key": "purpose",
          "question": "Why does it exist?",
          "statement": "Provide one consistent way to describe parameters, manage chosen values, resolve runtime configuration and request protected credential use."
        },
        {
          "key": "intention",
          "question": "What does it set out to do?",
          "statement": "Reuse the existing Corpus and deterministic execution paths, starting with production Settings and qualifying each missing custody boundary explicitly."
        },
        {
          "key": "agency",
          "question": "Who chooses and acts?",
          "statement": "The owning Thing and its authorized delegates decide within their scope. Definitions, saved values, model output and secret references confer no permission by themselves."
        },
        {
          "key": "capability",
          "question": "What can it actually do?",
          "statement": "Supply revisioned Settings, definition-driven rendering and validation, deterministic configuration resolution, and replaceable protected credential-use interfaces."
        },
        {
          "key": "consequence",
          "question": "What follows from it?",
          "statement": "Applications can share behavior without sharing all state or secrets. Uncertain effects, unavailable custody and stale configuration remain visible and cannot silently become success."
        },
        {
          "key": "responsibility",
          "question": "Who answers for it?",
          "statement": "The relevant Thing owns its records; reBe owns Settings and KeyRing experience, aThing owns portable data/control semantics, and theCy owns concrete configuration and custody providers."
        },
        {
          "key": "wisdom",
          "question": "What does it learn and keep?",
          "statement": "Preserve failures, context, revisions and receiving evidence. Turn repeated mistakes into checks and retire advice whose conditions no longer apply."
        },
        {
          "key": "unity",
          "question": "How does it fit with others?",
          "statement": "Use shared contracts and interoperable definitions across independent Realms while keeping ownership, admission and failure domains distinct."
        }
      ],
      "value": "Reduce repeated configuration work and accidental disclosure while making source-to-operation behavior understandable and repeatable."
    },
    "relationships": {
      "out": [],
      "in": [
        {
          "direction": "in",
          "type": "part-of",
          "source": "court",
          "label": "Court"
        }
      ]
    },
    "affinities": [],
    "usedIn": [],
    "lexicon": {
      "scope": "commons-core",
      "version": "8d67d98ce91b0a2b529d6b30934a77d3a7f2ef09a18b35410afa98c82fb3855a"
    }
  },
  "right": {
    "format": "rebe.estate-concept.v1",
    "kind": "concept",
    "term": {
      "id": "court",
      "label": "Court",
      "definition": "The institution of the Commons that hears motions and records verdicts under the Covenant. It decides; it never observes or executes.",
      "tier": "entrenched",
      "status": "proposed",
      "relations": [
        {
          "type": "distinct-from",
          "target": "agency"
        },
        {
          "type": "part-of",
          "target": "commons"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        "A motion to adopt the Commandments"
      ],
      "nonExamples": [
        "dOG Observation",
        "A provisioning Flow"
      ],
      "decisionRef": null,
      "conceptRef": null
    },
    "nine": {
      "state": "not captured",
      "source": null,
      "status": null,
      "facets": [
        {
          "key": "belief",
          "question": "What does it hold to be true?",
          "statement": null
        },
        {
          "key": "purpose",
          "question": "Why does it exist?",
          "statement": null
        },
        {
          "key": "intention",
          "question": "What does it set out to do?",
          "statement": null
        },
        {
          "key": "agency",
          "question": "Who chooses and acts?",
          "statement": null
        },
        {
          "key": "capability",
          "question": "What can it actually do?",
          "statement": null
        },
        {
          "key": "consequence",
          "question": "What follows from it?",
          "statement": null
        },
        {
          "key": "responsibility",
          "question": "Who answers for it?",
          "statement": null
        },
        {
          "key": "wisdom",
          "question": "What does it learn and keep?",
          "statement": null
        },
        {
          "key": "unity",
          "question": "How does it fit with others?",
          "statement": null
        }
      ],
      "value": null
    },
    "relationships": {
      "out": [
        {
          "direction": "out",
          "type": "distinct-from",
          "target": "agency",
          "label": "Agency"
        },
        {
          "direction": "out",
          "type": "part-of",
          "target": "commons",
          "label": "Commons"
        }
      ],
      "in": [
        {
          "direction": "in",
          "type": "requires",
          "source": "covenant",
          "label": "Covenant"
        }
      ]
    },
    "affinities": [
      {
        "id": "authority",
        "label": "Authority",
        "basis": [
          "both distinct-from agency"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "owner",
        "label": "Owner",
        "basis": [
          "both distinct-from agency"
        ]
      }
    ],
    "usedIn": [
      {
        "id": "R8",
        "kind": "right"
      }
    ],
    "lexicon": {
      "scope": "commons-core",
      "version": "8d67d98ce91b0a2b529d6b30934a77d3a7f2ef09a18b35410afa98c82fb3855a"
    }
  },
  "direct": [
    "Court part-of Commons"
  ],
  "shared": [],
  "nine": [
    {
      "key": "belief",
      "question": "What does it hold to be true?",
      "left": "People and machine Things should be able to choose behavior and resources while retaining control of their own data and credentials.",
      "right": null
    },
    {
      "key": "purpose",
      "question": "Why does it exist?",
      "left": "Provide one consistent way to describe parameters, manage chosen values, resolve runtime configuration and request protected credential use.",
      "right": null
    },
    {
      "key": "intention",
      "question": "What does it set out to do?",
      "left": "Reuse the existing Corpus and deterministic execution paths, starting with production Settings and qualifying each missing custody boundary explicitly.",
      "right": null
    },
    {
      "key": "agency",
      "question": "Who chooses and acts?",
      "left": "The owning Thing and its authorized delegates decide within their scope. Definitions, saved values, model output and secret references confer no permission by themselves.",
      "right": null
    },
    {
      "key": "capability",
      "question": "What can it actually do?",
      "left": "Supply revisioned Settings, definition-driven rendering and validation, deterministic configuration resolution, and replaceable protected credential-use interfaces.",
      "right": null
    },
    {
      "key": "consequence",
      "question": "What follows from it?",
      "left": "Applications can share behavior without sharing all state or secrets. Uncertain effects, unavailable custody and stale configuration remain visible and cannot silently become success.",
      "right": null
    },
    {
      "key": "responsibility",
      "question": "Who answers for it?",
      "left": "The relevant Thing owns its records; reBe owns Settings and KeyRing experience, aThing owns portable data/control semantics, and theCy owns concrete configuration and custody providers.",
      "right": null
    },
    {
      "key": "wisdom",
      "question": "What does it learn and keep?",
      "left": "Preserve failures, context, revisions and receiving evidence. Turn repeated mistakes into checks and retire advice whose conditions no longer apply.",
      "right": null
    },
    {
      "key": "unity",
      "question": "How does it fit with others?",
      "left": "Use shared contracts and interoperable definitions across independent Realms while keeping ownership, admission and failure domains distinct.",
      "right": null
    }
  ],
  "meaning": "Compared from declared Lexicon data only. Shared relationships are not a claim the concepts agree."
}